|
Post by Zorayda on Sept 8, 2012 19:51:42 GMT
Hey guys! I thought I'd put this up here because I've used TLK characters for several psychology/ethics projects. It got me thinking... the characters can be as complex as we imagine them. For example, using Kohler's stages ( wiki), we can determine that Scar is at stage 2 of development, because all of his actions are purely selfish. There are several other psychological theories and whatnot, a lot of which can be applied to our favorite characters... what do y'all think?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 28, 2012 3:42:36 GMT
I don't know how much I agree with this theory. I think morality is on a wider spectrum than this to be honest. I like to think people are more caring about others than stage one and stage two describe and it saddens me to think everyone was that uncaring at some point (as ot said stages can't be skipped). I think applyin psychology to characters though is interesting. Any other theories?
On another note are you studying psychology Zora? It's quite interesting isn't it?
|
|
Lokisenna
Rogue
Nice. Very, nice. - Zira
Posts: 241
|
Post by Lokisenna on Dec 14, 2012 5:54:29 GMT
Sarabii and many of the Minor Protagonists never showed such uncaring traits, in fact, most of the outlanders weren't uncaring, just mislead.
And have ou been so cruel and uncaring as scar? I mean I could not kill my siblings and I high doubt I ever could.
|
|